论文部分内容阅读
近年来,“核心期刊”已成为学术界、期刊界、教育界普遍关注的“核心”问题,差不多每次大规模的“核心期刊”遴选都会在学术界引起轩然大波,差不多每年一度的津贴评定、职称评审等都会使知识分子再次聚焦“核心期刊”。“核心期刊”用于论文评价,不仅与国际惯例貌合神离,而且与科学研究所崇尚的科学精神相悖。近年为社会有识之士强烈抨击的刊风、学风问题,其中核心期刊功能的异化和某些误导,也是有所染指的。
In recent years, “core journals ” has become a “core ” issue that is generally concerned by academics, periodicals and education circles, and almost every large-scale “core journal” selection will cause an uproar in academia. The annual allowance assessment, job evaluation and so on will make intellectuals focus again “core journals.” “Core Journal ” is used in the evaluation of dissertations, which is not only incompatible with international practice, but also contrary to the scientific spirit advocated by scientific research. In recent years, there has been some criticism of the style and style of study of the society for the insight of the society. Alienation and some misleading features of the core journals’ functions have also been accused of.