论文部分内容阅读
自20世纪90年代初以来,关于程序的研究呈现出一系列变化:首先,程序不再被仅仅解释为诉讼程序,其所指与能指范围扩大。其次,程序不再被仅仅视作手段,其独立性质、地位和价值被认同和强调。最后,程序的价值不再被仅仅定位于效率、稳定和安全,而越来越与法治、民主、自由、人权、正义等价值目标相关联,且联结的关节点正在于现代程序控制权力滥用以保障人权的价值指向。前述程序研究的后两种变化特别是程序之于控权意义的强调,所导引的是一个关于程序性立法的主旨和价值指向的讨论,这一讨论将在近期行将重新修订的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》立法目的之一的“维护”和“监督”这两个方面之间展开。
Since the early 1990s, there has been a series of changes in the study of procedures: first, the procedure is no longer interpreted merely as a proceeding, but the scope of the meaning and scope of the means can be expanded. Second, the process is no longer viewed merely as a means, its independent character, status and value are identified and emphasized. Finally, the value of the process is no longer relegated to efficiency, stability and security but increasingly to the value goals of the rule of law, democracy, freedom, human rights, and justice, and the knot of linkages lies in the abuse of the power of modern procedural control The value of safeguarding human rights points. The latter two changes in the study of the aforementioned procedures, and in particular the emphasis placed on the significance of control, lead to a discussion on the thrust and value orientation of procedural legislation, which will be revised in the near future by the “Chinese people Republic of China Administrative Procedure Law ”one of the legislative objectives of“ maintenance ”and“ supervision ”between these two aspects.