论文部分内容阅读
目的对比腹腔镜手术与剖腹手术治疗良性卵巢肿瘤患者的临床效果。方法良性卵巢肿瘤患者160例随机分为腹腔镜手术组和剖腹手术组各80例,治疗后比较2组临床效果。结果腹腔手术组患者肛门的排气时间、住院时间、出血量、患者自主下床进行活动的时间以及进行手术的时间均少于剖腹手术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论腹腔镜手术患者的临床效果较好,可以缩短患者的住院时间,减轻痛苦。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in patients with benign ovarian tumors. Methods Totally 160 patients with benign ovarian tumors were randomly divided into laparoscopic surgery group and laparotomy group, 80 cases each. After treatment, the clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results The anal exhaust time, hospitalization time, blood loss, patients’ time to go out of bed and the operation time in the abdominal operation group were all less than those in the laparotomy group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion The clinical effect of laparoscopic surgery is better, which can shorten the hospitalization time and relieve the pain.