高考平权是一个“程序性正义”和“补偿性正义”话题。“程序性正义”主张一个中立的程序适用于任何社会群体,而无论结果如何。“补偿性正义”则主张根据历史、文化、经济条件有偏向地制定法律和政策,以保证一个相对公平的结果。纵观中外教育平权运动,无不经历漫长波折的过程,国家的政策支持、民众的强烈呼声、既得利益者的反复博弈,在这些因素的综合叠加下,教育改革的结果方能逐渐接近公平。我国高考常被人诟病的不是招生考试是否统一命题,也不是分省区市划高考录取控制分数线,而是地区间的 College entrance examination is a “procedural justice ” and “compensatory justice ” topic. “Procedural justice ” claims that a neutral procedure applies to any social group, regardless of the outcome. Compensatory Justice advocates biased laws and policies based on historical, cultural and economic conditions to ensure a relatively fair result. Looking at both the Chinese and foreign educational rights-affirmative movements, all have gone through long twists and turns, the state’s policy support, the public’s strong voice, the repeated game of vested interests, and the comprehensive reform of these factors can gradually bring the result of education reform to fairness. Our college entrance examination has often been criticized is not a unified proposition examination, nor is it divided into provinces and autonomous regions admission admission control scores, but inter-regional