论文部分内容阅读
尽管有不少尝试,但“党的领导”问题尚未在宪法学中获得充分的理论化。当然,在一开始我们就应当强调,法学上的理论化一方面是对事实的观察与结构化,另一方面则受制于所观察对象牵涉的各种规范性条件。在此意义上,法学上的理论化总是带有批判或辩护的意味,也就是说,它总是某种特定方向的解释。因为在最低的限度上,它都应当澄清研究对象的规范状况,而对这种规范状况的认识本身所表现的,不是规范上无矛盾的,就是规范上冲突的;如果是冲突的,则还可能进一步表明,这种规范上冲突的状况是可调和的或者不可
Despite many attempts, the issue of “party leadership” has not yet been fully theorized in constitutional law. Of course, we should emphasize from the very beginning that legal theorization of law is, on the one hand, the observation and structuring of facts, and on the other hand, by the normative conditions involved in the observed objects. In this sense, legal theorizing always has the meaning of criticism or defense, that is to say, it is always a certain direction of explanation. Because at its lowest, it should clarify the normative situation of the object of study, and the understanding of such normative situation itself is not normatively contradictory and normatively conflicting nor, in the case of conflict, It may be further shown that the normative conflict is regulatable or irrelevant