论文部分内容阅读
为了推动马克思主义和现象学的深入交流与共同发展,雪莉·派克主张我们应对这两种思想进行理论整合。在她看来,整合工作不是对这二者进行比较或合并,也不是让二者相互诠释,而是开展那种保持其各自独立性的对话。派克不满于黑格尔的马克思主义者们对整体性的本体论预设,也不满于结构主义的马克思主义者们根据自然科学或实证科学来理解马克思思想和使用科学性概念。跟随恩佐·帕齐提出的胡塞尔的马克思主义路线,派克认为马克思和胡塞尔都在晚期发生了思想转向,并采用了实质相似的“危机”概念来定位其时代精神的症候。派克强调,《资本论》与《欧洲科学的危机和先验现象学》分别代表着马克思和胡塞尔成熟时期的思想,马克思主义和现象学的有效对话和整合必须以这二者的成熟思想为基础才有开展的可能。
In order to promote the in-depth exchange and common development of Marxism and phenomenology, Shirley Parker advocates that we should theoretically integrate these two kinds of thinking. In her opinion, instead of comparing or merging the two, the integration effort does not allow the two to interpret each other, but rather to engage in a dialogue that maintains their own independence. Parker is dissatisfied with Hegel’s Marxist assumption of holistic ontology and unscrupulous structuralist Marxists who understand Marxist ideas and use scientific concepts according to natural science or empirical science. Following Enzo Pazzi’s Husserl’s Marxist line, Park argues that both Marx and Husserl were late in ideological shifts and adopted a substantially similar concept of “crisis” to locate the symptoms of the times . Parker emphasized that “capitalism” and “the crisis and transcendental phenomenology of science in Europe” represent the thoughts of the mature period of Marx and Husserl respectively. The effective dialogue and integration between Marxism and phenomenology must be based on the mature thought of both As the basis for the possibility of carrying out.