论文部分内容阅读
案情导读上诉人(原审原告):北京市朝阳区现代城住宅小区物业管理委员会(以下简称管委会)被上诉人(原审被告):北京中海物业管理有限公司(以下简称北京中海公司)被上诉人(原审被告):深圳中海物业管理有限公司(以下简称深圳中海公司)管委会在原审中诉称:1999年1月8日,北京中鸿天房地产开发有限公司与深圳中海物业管理有限公司(以下简称深圳中海公司,即原中海物业管理深圳有限公司)签订了《北京现代城物业管理全权委托合同》。合同约定,深圳中海公司对小区进行物业管理,物业费每建筑平方米4元。1999年12月,北京中海物业管理有限公司(以下简称北京中海公司)开始实施物业管理,并收取物业管理费。2001年8月1日,现代城成立管委会。2002年1月,北京中海公司退出现代城的物业管理服务。管委会成立后即接管了原由开发商承担的对物业管理企业进行监
Case Information The appellant (plaintiff): Beijing Modern City Residential District Property Management Committee (hereinafter referred to as the CMC) Appellee (former defendant): Beijing Zhonghai Property Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Beijing Zhonghai Company) was appealed Person (original trial defendant): Shenzhen Zhonghai Property Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen China Shipping Company) The CMC said in its original trial that on January 8, 1999, Beijing Zhongtian Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Zhonghai Property Management Co., Ltd. (Hereinafter referred to as Shenzhen Zhonghai Company, formerly Zhonghai Property Management Shenzhen Co., Ltd.) signed the “Beijing Hyundai City property management discretionary trust contract.” Contract, Shenzhen China Shipping Company in the area of property management, property costs 4 yuan per square meter of construction. In December 1999, Beijing Zhonghai Property Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Beijing Zhonghai Company) began to implement property management and charged property management fees. August 1, 2001, the establishment of modern city management committee. January 2002, Beijing China Shipping Company to withdraw from the modern city of property management services. After the establishment of the CMC to take over the developers originally undertaken by the property management companies to monitor