论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析慢性萎缩性胃炎的胃镜下表现与病理诊断二者的符合率,并提出相应对策。方法:选择120例慢性萎缩性胃炎患者为研究对象,对其行胃镜检查与病理学检查,对比两种检查方式的差异。结果:从检查结果可以看出,胃镜下表现与病理诊断结果不一致,P<0.05。24例患者胃镜诊断被诊断为慢性浅表性胃炎,但是病理诊断却为慢性萎缩性胃炎,经胃镜诊断是特殊类型胃炎的患者,通过病理诊断显示为慢性浅表性胃炎。结论:通过分析慢性萎缩性胃炎的内镜表现与病理诊断结果,二者符合率存在明显差异,将二者结合起来可以显著提升确诊率。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the coincidence rate of endoscopic diagnosis and pathological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis and to put forward corresponding countermeasures. Methods: A total of 120 patients with chronic atrophic gastritis were selected as study subjects. Their gastroscopy and pathology were compared, and the differences between the two methods were compared. Results: It can be seen from the examination results, endoscopy and pathological findings inconsistent, P <0.05.24 cases of gastroscopy diagnosed as chronic superficial gastritis, but the pathological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis, gastroscopy diagnosis Patients with a particular type of gastritis are shown to have chronic superficial gastritis by pathological diagnosis. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between the two groups in the coincidence rate of endoscopic diagnosis and pathological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis. The combination of the two can significantly improve the diagnosis rate.