前循环急性缺血性脑卒中脑灌注水平与认知障碍的相关性研究

来源 :中国综合临床 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liuhui098
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析首发前循环急性缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍患者脑灌注水平的变化及与认知障碍的关系。方法:选取2018年3月至2020年3月于华北理工大学附属开滦总医院神经内科治疗并符合纳入、排除标准的70例首发前循环急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性分析。采用简易精神状态检查量表(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)分为卒中后认知障碍(post-stroke cognitive impairment,PSCI)组36例,卒中后无认知障碍组34例。全部入选患者行电子计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)和磁共振弥散加权成像(diffusion-weighted MR imaging,MRI-DWI)确立诊断和明确病灶分布;应用磁共振血管造影(magnetic resonance angiography,MRA)检测脑供血动脉狭窄情况;应用三维准连续动脉自旋标记(3D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling,3D-pCASL)灌注成像技术,设置两个标记后延迟时间(post label delay,PLD)1.5、2.5 s检测脑血流量。结果:(1)两组间临床基本资料比较差异均无统计学意义(n P均>0.05)。(2)卒中后认知障碍组病灶侧存在大脑中动脉(middle cerebral artery,MCA)、大脑前动脉(anterior cerebral artery,ACA)、颈内动脉(internal carotid artery,ICA)≥1条或≥2条中重度狭窄/闭塞患者比例[91.67%(33/36)、33.33%(12/36)]高于卒中后无认知障碍组[23.53%(8/34)、8.82%(3/34)];卒中后认知障碍组病灶侧分别存在MCA、ICA中、重度狭窄/闭塞患者比例[69.44%(25/36)、44.44%(16/36)]高于卒中后无认知障碍组[14.71%(5/34)、11.76%(4/34)];差异均有统计学意义(χn 2值分别为33.455、6.239、21.394、9.150,n P均<0.05)。⑶卒中后认知障碍组同时存在≥2个脑区梗死病灶患者比例[61.1%(22/36)]及额叶梗死病灶构成比[38.03%(27/71)]高于卒中后无认知障碍组[20.6%(7/34)与19.05%(8/42)],差异均有统计学意义(χn 2值分别为11.833、4.447,n P均<0.05);PLD 2.5 s时,卒中后认知障碍组额叶梗死病灶CBF值[(31.516±8.333) mL/(100 g·min)]低于卒中后无认知障碍组[(45.442±8.281) mL/(100 g·min)],差异有统计学意义(n t=3.835,n P<0.05);相关性分析发现,PLD 2.5 s额叶梗死病灶CBF值与MMSE评分呈正相关(n r=0.738,n P<0.05)。⑷卒中后认知障碍组PLD 1.5、2.5 s病灶侧存在≥1个或≥2个低灌注脑区(额叶、颞叶、顶叶)患者比例[88.89%(32/36)、88.89%(32/36)、77.78%(28/36)、66.67%(24/36)]高于卒中后无认知障碍组[67.65%(23/34)、8.82%(3/34)、29.41%(10/34)、0],差异有统计学意义(χn 2值分别为4.686、44.837、16.483、34.493,n P均<0.05);PLD 1.5 s时,卒中后认知障碍组病灶侧低灌注脑区额叶、顶叶CBF值[(20.260±5.266) mL/(100 g·min)、(17.664±3.947) mL/(100 g·min)]低于卒中后无认知障碍组[(33.442±10.563) mL/(100 g·min)、(28.071±6.913) mL/(100 g·min)],差异有统计学意义(n t=3.392、6.225,n P均<0.05);PLD 2.5 s时,卒中后认知障碍组病灶侧额叶、顶叶、颞叶低灌注代偿后CBF值[(37.732±8.355) mL/(100 g·min)、(32.942±6.459) mL/(100 g·min)、(39.282±7.443) mL/(100 g·min)]低于卒中后无认知障碍组[(57.189±9.965) mL/(100 g·min)、(52.415±7.017) mL/(100 g·min)、(49.258±8.912) mL/(100 g·min)],差异均有统计学意义(n t值分别为5.443、10.227、2.950,n P均<0.05);相关性分析发现,PLD 1.5 s病灶侧低灌注脑区额叶、顶叶CBF值及PLD 2.5 s低灌注脑区额叶、顶叶、颞叶低灌注代偿后的CBF值均与MMSE评分呈正相关(n r值分别为0.693、0.675、0.823、0.799、0.545,n P均0.05). (2) The proportion of patients with middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery and internal carotid artery ≥1 or ≥2 moderate and severe stenosis / occlusion on the focal side in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group (91.67%(33/36), 33.33%(12/36)) was higher than that in the post-stroke non-cognitive impairment group (23.53%(8/34), 8.82%(3/34)); the proportion of patients with moderate and severe stenosis / occlusion of MCA and ICA on the focal side in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group (69.44%(25/36), 44.44%(16/36)) was higher than that in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group (14.71%(5/34), 11.76%(4/34)), and the difference was statistically significant(χn 2 values were 33.455, 6.239, 21.394, 9.150, all n P<0.05). (3) The proportion of patients with ≥ 2 cerebral infarction lesions in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group (61.1%(22/36))was higher than that in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group (38.03%(27/71))than that in the non-stroke group (20.6%(7/34), 19.05%(8/42)), and the difference was statistically significant(χn 2=11.833, 4.447, all n P<0.05). PLD 2.5 s, the CBF value of frontal lobe infarction in post-stroke cognitive impairment group((31.516±8.333) mL/(100 g·min)) was lower than that in post-stroke non-cognitive impairment group((45.442±8.281) mL/(100 g·min)), the difference was statistically significant(n t=3.835, n P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the CBF value of PLD 2.5 s frontal infarction lesion was positively correlated with MMSE score(n r=0.738, n P<0.05). (4) The proportion of patients with ≥ 1 or ≥ 2 hypoperfusion areas (frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe) on the focal side of PLD 1.5 s and 2.5 s after stroke (88.89%(32/36), 88.89%(32/36), 77.78%(28/36), 66.67%(24/36)) were higher than those without cognitive impairment after stroke (67.65%(23/34), 8.82%(3/34), 29.41%(10/34), 0), the difference was statistically significant(χn 2 values were 4.686, 44.837, 16.483, 34.493, all n P<0.05). At PLD 1.5 s, CBF values of frontal lobe and parietal lobe in cerebral hypoperfusion area ((20.260±5.266) mL/(100 g·min), (17.664±3.947) mL/(100 g·min)) in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke were lower than those in patients without cognitive impairment ((33.442±10.563) mL/(100 g·min), (28.071±6.913) mL/(100 g·min)), the difference was statistically significant(n t values were 3.392, 6.225, all n P<0.05), at PLD 2.5 s, the CBF value after compensatory perfusion of frontal lobe, parietal lobe and temporal lobe in the post-stroke cognitive impairment group ((37.732±8.355) mL/(100 g·min), (32.942±6.459) mL/(100 g·min), (39.282±7.443) mL/(100 g·min)) was lower than that in the non cognitive impairment Group ((57.189±9.965) mL/(100 g·min), (52.415±7.017) mL/(100 g·min), (49.258±8.912) mL/(100 g·min)), the difference was statistically significant(n t values were 5.443, 10.227, 2.950, all n P<0.05). Correlation analysis found that the CBF value of the frontal lobe and parietal lobe of the PLD 1.5 s lesion area and the CBF value of the PLD 2.5 s hypoperfusion brain area after the perfusion of the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and temporal lobe were positively correlated with the MMSE score(n r values were 0.693, 0.675, 0.823, 0.799, 0.545, all n P<0.05).n Conclusion:Patients with first anterior circulation acute ischemic post-stroke cognitive impairment often have extensive hypoperfusion in the peripheral cerebral region, the occurrence of cognitive impairment after the first anterior circulation acute ischemic post-stroke cognitive impairment is related to the decrease of the perfusion level of the infarct lesion and the brain area around the lesion.
其他文献
目的:探讨布地奈德福莫特罗联合噻托溴铵治疗哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠(asthma COPD overlap,ACO)的临床效果及安全性。方法:选择2016年1月至2018年12月开滦总医院林西医院呼
为了提高热连轧无缝钢管生产企业工艺人员对生产过程的有效把握,减少人为因素对产品质量的影响,研究并开发出了热连轧无缝钢管轧线过程自动化系统.该系统在国内某无缝钢管生
2007年的夏天,无数观众见证了奇迹的诞生:短短两三个月时间内,一批优秀的歌手从“快乐男生”比赛中脱颖而出,转瞬间成为万众瞩目的平民偶像。而其中最受人关注的一位,就是此次比赛的全国总冠军——陈楚生。然而却很少有人知道,陈楚生坚持着梦想一路走来有多么艰辛;他用了近十年的时间,终于赢得了父亲的理解和支持……    爱上音乐,平民家庭走出来的叛逆少年    陈楚生1981年6月24日出生于海南省三亚市天
面对黄宗英,如何称呼是个问题。论辈分,她和我母亲年龄不相上下,按我们农村老家的叫法,该叫她黄婶儿,若按城里的规矩呢,当然该叫她黄阿姨了;论学识,她涉猎多个领域,作品丰硕,且是大学者冯亦代的夫人,应称她黄先生才对。然而,我想了想——还是叫黄老师吧。果然,她愉快地答应着,脸上洋溢着美丽的笑。  那是2001年春天的事情了。  中国现代文学馆院落里的白玉兰正在盛开。在这样的季节,这样的殿堂,世界自然基金