论文部分内容阅读
本刊今年第2期《案例沙龙之抛砖引玉》刊出《摩托车案违法行为如何定性》一文后,各地质量技术监督部门不少同仁来稿阐述自己的观点,其中广西西林县质且技术监督局李教荣等大多数同志认为销售者县五金公司有较丰富的购销经验,进货者明知该摩托车价格低廉,不是正牌企业生产,因此肯定其有主观上的故意,从而断定其违法行为是销售了伪造产地、伪造或冒用他人厂名厂址的产品,但在处罚依据或额度上有所不同。
This issue of the second issue of this year, “the case of Shaodongzhitiao jade” published “how to determine the nature of motorcycles violations,” a lot of colleagues throughout the quality and technical supervision departments to elaborate his point of view, of which Quality and Technical Supervision Guangxi Xilin Li Jiao Rong, etc. Most of the comrades think the seller County Hardware Company has a wealth of experience in buying and selling, the purchasers know that the motorcycle cheap, not a genuine business production, so surely have a subjective intention to conclude that the offense is sold Fake origin, forgery or fraudulent use of other people’s factory name of the site of the product, but the punishment basis or amount of different.