论文部分内容阅读
本文指出,马克思笔下的由粗放经营向集约经营的转化,彭慕兰所阐述的18世纪之后西欧与东亚经济发展的大相径庭,以及迈克尔·波特所讲的一些自然资源短缺的国家,反倒在更高的层次上经济发展良好的事实,都是因为在资源逼迫之下选择了具有创新功能的、高技术含量的经济增长模式。文章强调,具有创新功能的、高技术含量的经济增长模式的选择,除了资源逼迫之外,还必须具有能够激励创新的制度安排,并为此进行了历史上西欧和东亚的对照分析。论文所阐述的观点对我国当代经济发展极具现实意义:我国经济发达地区,不应当陶醉于传统的比较优势,而应当适时地提升经济增长模式,增强国际竞争力。论文还探讨了在我国适时提升经济增长模式的制度安排及与此相关的改革。
This paper points out that the transformation from extensive management to intensive management in Marx’s writings is very different from the economic development of East Asia after the eighteenth century as described by Pomeranian and that some natural resource deficits mentioned by Michael Porter lie in the higher The fact that economic growth is good at all levels is due to the fact that under the perseverance of resources, an innovative and high-tech model of economic growth has been chosen. The article emphasizes that the choice of an innovative and high-tech model of economic growth must have an institutional arrangement that can stimulate innovation in addition to resource persecution. A historical comparative analysis of Western Europe and East Asia has been made. The viewpoints elaborated in the dissertation have great practical significance for the development of our country’s contemporary economy. In our economically developed regions, we should not revel in the traditional comparative advantages, but should timely promote the mode of economic growth and enhance our international competitiveness. The paper also explores the institutional arrangements for timely upgrading of the economic growth model in our country and the related reforms.