论文部分内容阅读
目的研究常规护理和循证护理高龄骨质疏松性股骨骨折患者效果及护理满意度对比。方法选择高龄骨质疏松性股骨骨折患者64例,将循证护理32例作为观察组,另外常规护理的32例作为对照组。对采取以上两种护理方法,应用Harris髋关节功能评分,对两组患者采取不同的不同的护理方法,观察两组的治愈情况以及护理满意度,进行记录和分析。结果观察组应用Harris髋关节功能评分高于对照组组同时两者满意程度调查中前者也好于后者,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论循证护理高龄骨质疏松性股骨骨折患者效果及护理满意度有着有明显的提高,可以加快患者康复的速度,可以进行推广应用。
Objective To study the effect of conventional nursing and evidence-based nursing care on elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral fracture and the satisfaction of nursing satisfaction. Methods Sixty-four patients with osteoporotic osteoporotic fracture of femur were selected. 32 cases of evidence-based nursing as observation group and 32 cases of routine nursing as control group. To take the above two nursing methods, the Harris hip function score was used to treat the two groups with different and different nursing methods. The cure and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were observed and recorded and analyzed. Results In the observation group, the Harris hip function score was higher than that of the control group, while the former was also better than the latter in the satisfaction degree of the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based nursing care of elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral fracture effect and nursing satisfaction has been significantly improved, can speed up the rehabilitation of patients, can be promoted.