论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤患者的临床效果比较。方法选取2014年3月至2015年3月沈阳市妇婴医院收治的58例子宫肌瘤患者作为研究对象,按治疗方法不同随机将其分为观察组和对照组,各29例。观察组患者经腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗,对照组患者经开腹手术治疗,比较两组患者临床效果。结果观察组患者术中出血量明显少于对照组,手术时间、术后首次排气时间、体温恢复正常时间、住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.056,P<0.05)。结论子宫肌瘤经腹腔镜子宫剔除术治疗,临床效果确切。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic myomectomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with uterine fibroids. Methods Fifty-eight patients with uterine leiomyoma treated in Shenyang Maternal and Child Hospital from March 2014 to March 2015 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 29 cases in each group. The patients in the observation group were treated by laparoscopic myomectomy and the patients in the control group were treated by laparotomy. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results The bleeding volume in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group. The operation time, the first postoperative exhaust time, the normal body temperature recovery time and hospital stay were significantly shorter than those in the control group (all P <0.05) The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2 = 8.056, P <0.05). Conclusion Uterine fibroids by laparoscopic hysterectomy, the exact clinical effect.