“赛车”告赢“汽车人”

来源 :浦东开发 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:NewMagic
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
抄袭和傍名牌最终要付出代价。国产动画片《汽车人总动员》抄袭《赛车总动员》《赛车总动员2》,被判著作权侵权及不正当竞争,并付出高额赔款。2015年7月,国产动画片《汽车人总动员》上映。然而,迪士尼企业公司(下称迪士尼公司)、皮克斯公司却发现,这部电影从名称、动画形象到宣传海报,都涉嫌抄袭了自己的两部知名电影《赛车总动员》《赛车总动员2》,遂将该影片的制作方厦门蓝火焰影视动漫有限公司(下称蓝火焰公司)、发行方北京基点影视文化传媒有限公司(下称基点公司)等起诉至法院,除要 Plagiarism and Pong brand eventually have to pay the price. Domestic cartoon “Car Story” plagiarism “Car Story” “Car Story 2”, was sentenced to copyright infringement and unfair competition, and pay high claims. July 2015, domestic animation “Car Story” released. However, the Disney Enterprise Company (hereinafter referred to as Disney Company), Pixar Company found that the film from the name, animated images to posters, are suspected of plagiarizing his two well-known movie “Racing Story” “Racing Story 2”, then The film producer Xiamen Blue Flame Television Animation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Blue Flame), the issuer Beijing Point Film and Television Media Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the base company) and other prosecution to the court, in addition to
其他文献