论文部分内容阅读
2003年SARS事件后,我国应急管理的研究得到了重视,文献述评也在增多。通过建构文献质量评价体系和Meta分析,总体发现,有价值的文献述评数量较少,总体质量不高,存在参考文献不全面、资料来源不清楚、科学研究方法不足、缺乏评论和发展预测的建议等问题。从比较的角度看,专题性文献述评的质量整体上低于同时期学科性文献述评的质量,而且专题性文献述评与社会现实中重大突发事件的应对与研究脱节。从发展趋势的角度看,随着时间的变化,后期文献述评质量较高,国内应急管理文献述评的质量在逐步提升。
After the SARS incident in 2003, the research on emergency management in our country has been taken seriously, and the literature review is also increasing. Through the construction of literature quality evaluation system and Meta-analysis, it is found that there are few reviews of valuable literature, low overall quality, incomplete references, unclear sources of information, inadequate scientific methods, lack of comments and prediction of development And other issues. From a comparative perspective, the quality of monograph reviews is generally lower than the quality of reviews of academic documents in the same period, and the reviews of monographs and the responses to major emergencies in social reality are out of step. From the perspective of development trend, with the change of time, the quality of later period literature review is higher, and the quality of the review of domestic emergency management literature is gradually improving.