论文部分内容阅读
现行《专利法》、《专利审查指南》以及《专利合作条约国际检索和初步审查指南》均未对由“合乎逻辑的分析、推理以及有限的试验”到“显而易见性”的导出原则或步骤进行规定,可能导致专利审查结论不一致。本文根据相关概念以及具体审查案例,对“合乎逻辑的分析、推理或有限的试验”与发明创造性中之显而易见性二者之间的关系进行分析,并对判断原则和具体判断步骤的提出了完善建议。
None of the current “Patent Law”, “Guide to Patent Examination” and “Guide to International Search and Preliminary Examination of Patent Cooperation Treaty” derive from the “logical analysis, reasoning and limited test” to “obviousness” Principles or steps to make provisions that may lead to patent examination inconsistent conclusions. Based on the related concepts and the specific case studies, this paper analyzes the relationship between the “logical analysis, reasoning or limited test” and the obviousness of invention creativity, and puts forward the principle of judgment and specific judgment steps Perfect advice.