论文部分内容阅读
敦煌《毛诗音》残卷P.3383里的直音注有两个特点:(一)为数不多,对反切注的比率较小,(二)直音注里“同声直音”较多,即直音字的声符多与被注字相同。直音注在S.2729里为数更少。本文因而对敦煌《毛诗音》假定甲、乙两个祖本,还假定一个蓝本,据此解释:甲祖本把蓝本的普通反切和直音按自己采用的独特结构原则改换为新式反切,只留存了“同声直音”;留存的理由当是“同声直音”写在卷子背面就容易认识表面被注字的缘故。乙祖本则把这些直音也都改换为新式反切了;P.3383属甲祖本系统,S.2729则属乙祖本系统。
Dunhuang “Mao poem tone” residual volume P.3383 in the direct tone Note has two characteristics: (a) a small number, the ratio of anti-cut small, (2) direct sound note in the “direct sound” more More, that is, the direct sound of the character and the note is the same word. Direct notes in S.2729 in a smaller number. Therefore, this thesis assumes that both A and B ancestors of Dunhuang “Mao Poems” also assume a blueprint, which explains that: K’v’zun changed the blunt blunt ordinary anticunctions and direct sounds into the new antisociation according to their own unique structure principle, “Simultaneous Direct Sound ”; Retention reasons when it is “Simultaneous Direct Sound ” written in the back of the paper easy to recognize the surface is the word note. The ancestor of B also changed these orthonormals into new anti-cuts; P.3383 belongs to the ancestral system, while S.2729 belongs to B-ancestral system.