论文部分内容阅读
本文是从包勃尔的《历史主义的贫困》一书摘译的,关于这本书的主要论点,本刊1959年第1期书刊简讯栏曾简略作过介绍,另本刊1960年第6期“对几个反历史主义思想家的评述”一文对包勃尔在本书中所发表的见解也表示了不同的意见,可以作为参考。包勃尔是现代被英国学术界捧得很高的科学方法论者和逻辑学家,但是从这篇摘译也可以看出,他的基本态度是反科学的,也是反理性主义的。他把人类的科学成就看得很可怜,以至于认为任何具有科学预见的社会改革(包括社会主义、共产主义革命)都是空想的,并把任何形式的整体主义(他把马克思主义也包括在这个名目下面)都说成是前科学时代的特点,真是荒谬到了极顶。归根到底,包勃尔的目的只是要为保持资本主义制度不变而已。
This article is from Paul Poirot’s book “The Poverty of Historicism,” a book on the main argument, the magazine published in the first issue of 1959, a brief introduction column briefly introduced, The article “A Review of Several Anti-Historical Thinkers” also expresses different views on Paul Bauer’s views expressed in this book as a reference. Paul Boer is a modern science methodologist and logician who is highly regarded by British academia. However, it can also be seen from this excerpt that his basic attitude is anti-science and anti-rationalism. He views the scientific achievements of mankind as miserable so that any scientific reform that has been foreseen (including socialism and the communist revolution) is utopian and considers any form of holism (which includes Marxism in This name below) are said to be characterized by the pre-scientific era, it is ridiculous to the very top. In the final analysis, Paul Boyle’s purpose is only to maintain the capitalist system unchanged.