经过对二十世纪八十年代文学史进行了近五年的历史化研究后,我们意识到一个问题,文学史研究可能最终还是要落实到作品上来。这么说或许不新鲜,“新批评”一直就倡导作品中心主义,而八十年代以来文学批评的所谓“向内转”也有此趋向。但是我们的工作显然与此有别,其中最大的区别在于,作品细读不仅仅拘囿于作品文本的修辞、结构和故事,而是把这些敞开为一个更大的文本。 After a historical study of literary history in the 1980s for nearly five years, we are aware of a problem that the study of the history of literature may eventually come to fruition. This may not be new, and “New Criticism” has always advocated work-centrism. The so-called “inward turn” of literary criticism since the 1980s also has this tendency. Obviously our work is obviously different. The biggest difference is that the careful reading of the work is not limited to the rhetoric, structure and story of the text of the work. Instead, it opens up a wider text.