论文部分内容阅读
我国著作权法规定,剽窃他人作品构成侵权行为,但对剽窃的法律认定却未作出具体规定,司法实践中通常采用“接触”加“实质性相似”进行检验。“实质性相似”作为认定剽窃的核心要件,其判断方法实务和理论界均争议较大,无法达成一致意见。本文旨在结合影视作品自身特点和行业现状以及著作权法立法价值等对影视作品实质性相似判定方法进行研究,分析部分比较法之不足,推荐适用整体比较法以更好地激励创新,平衡原作者、使用者和社会公众之间的利益。
The copyright law of our country stipulates that the plagiarism of others’ works constitutes infringement, but there is no specific regulation on the legal recognition of plagiarism. The judicial practice usually adopts “contact” plus “substantive similarity” for testing. “Substantive Similar ” as the core element of plagiarism, the judgments of practice and theory are controversial, unable to reach a consensus. The purpose of this paper is to study the similarities and differences between films and movies based on their own characteristics and current situation as well as the legislative value of the copyright law, and to analyze the inadequacies of some comparative methods. It is recommended that the overall comparative method be applied to better stimulate innovation and balance the original author , The interests of users and the public.