2012年修正后的我国《民事诉讼法》第156条对人民法院生效裁判文书的公开作出了明确的规定。然而,在实践中对生效裁判文书的公开范围、案件当事人隐私和国家秘密的保护等问题存在争议,影响了该条的适用。造成上述问题的原因在于目前采取利益法学的立场来设定和理解裁判文书公开制度的目的,因此有必要对裁判文书公开制度的目的进行探讨,在此基础上对《民事诉讼法》第156条进行再次理解和评价。 In 2012, Article 156 of China’s Civil Procedural Law, as amended, clearly stipulates the openness of the court judgments before the people’s courts. However, in practice, there are controversies over the public scope of the effective adjudication instruments, the privacy of the parties to the case and the protection of state secrets, which affects the application of the article. The reason of the above problems lie in the purpose of setting and understanding the open system of judgment instruments by adopting the position of interest jurisprudence. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the purpose of open system of judgment instruments. On this basis, Article 156 of the Code of Civil Procedure To understand and comment again.