论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨静脉输液拔针后两者不同按压方法对患者皮下出血的影响。方法:将86例患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各43例,观察组采用改良按压法,对照组采用常规按压法,观察并记录拔针后患者皮下出血情况。结果:根据皮下出血情况比较两组患者按压效果,P值<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论:按压方法改良后能够有效避免拔针后皮下出血及淤血的发生,减少病患痛苦提高舒适度。
Objective To investigate the effect of different compression methods on subcutaneous hemorrhage in patients after needle infusion. Methods: 86 patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 43 cases in each group. The observation group was treated by modified compression method. The control group was treated by conventional compression method. The subcutaneous hemorrhage after injection was observed and recorded. Results: According to the situation of subcutaneous hemorrhage, the compression effect was compared between the two groups, P <0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusion: The improvement of pressing method can effectively prevent the occurrence of subcutaneous bleeding and congestion after needle-pulling, reduce the suffering of patients and improve the comfort.