论文部分内容阅读
中国足球场上的“黑哨”问题成为全社会关注的热点和焦点话题,该问题也引起了法学界的讨论。中国足协针对广州吉利俱乐部起诉其侵犯名誉权一案,向广州市天河区人民法院提出管辖权异议,认为根据我国相关法律和最高人民法院的司法解释,以及《国际足联章程》、《亚洲足联章程》和《中国足协章程》等的规定,认为此纠纷不属于法院受理案件范围,法院对该案没有管辖权。中国足协的这一法律行为,在前一段时间引起广泛争论的对裁判受贿丑闻能否“司法介入”的难题之上,又加上了一个对体育竞赛纠纷能否“司法介入”的问题,显得越来越复杂,越来越尖端。解决好
The issue of “black whistle” on the Chinese football field has become a hot topic and a hot topic for the whole society. This issue has also caused discussions in the legal field. The Chinese Football Association accused Guangzhou Geely Club of suing for infringement of its reputation right and filed a jurisdiction objection to the Tianhe District People’s Court in Guangzhou City. According to the relevant laws of China and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the FIFA Constitution, Association constitution “and” Chinese Football Association constitution “and other provisions, that this dispute does not belong to the court to accept the scope of the case, the court has no jurisdiction over the case. This legal act of the Chinese Football Association, which caused controversy over a period of time ago, raised the issue of whether the judicial bribery scandal can ”intervene in the judiciary“ and added a question whether ”judicial intervention" can be involved in disputes over sports competition. More complex and more sophisticated. Solve well