论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨火车司机艾森克人格状况,为铁路行车安全提供心理学依据。方法采用龚耀先修订的艾森克成人式人格量表测试广西柳州机务段火车司机403名。评定标准:将外倾性(E)、神经质(N)维度划分5个类型:①T<38.5为典型内倾(或典型不稳定);②T 38.5～43.3为内倾倾向(或稳定倾向);③T 43.4～56.6为中间;④T 56.7～61.5为外倾(或不稳定倾向);⑤T>61.5为典型外倾(或典型不稳定)。将精神质(P)、掩饰倾向(L)维度以计分高于平均数的程度来判断,P量表:T>61.5为典型精神质,T 56.7～61.5为趋向精神质,T<56.7为正常,L量表:T>70为无效。结果 142(35.23%)人为外倾及典型外倾,145人(35.98%)情绪为倾向不稳定及典型不稳定,情绪不稳定在内倾者中占58.82%(50/85);16(3.97%)人倾向精神质及典型精神质;社会掩饰倾向呈低偏态分布。E值(外倾-内倾)与行政人员和工人比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);N值(神经质)和L值(掩饰倾向)与行政人员、工人、科技人员和司法警察比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);P值(精神质)与行政人员、科技人员和司法警察比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);E、N、P、L在年龄和受教育程度方面仅N(神经质)值差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论火车司机艾森克人格特质倾向情绪不稳定、朴实幼稚和温柔心肠;外向稳定的人更适合从事火车驾驶员工作;艾森克人格特质受年龄和教育程度影响轻微。
Objective To explore the condition of Eysenck’s personality in train drivers and to provide a psychological basis for the safety of railway traffic. Methods A total of 403 train drivers in Liuzhou locomotive depot were tested by Eysenck’s Adult Personality Scale revised by Gong Yaoxian. Criteria for evaluation: The extrinsic (E) and neurotic (N) dimensions were divided into five categories: ① T <38.5 was typical inset (or typical instability); ② T 38.5-43.3 was intentive (or stable); ③ T 43.4 ~ 56.6 for the middle; ④ T 56.7 ~ 61.5 is extraversion (or unstable tendency); ⑤ T> 61.5 is a typical camber (or typical instability). The psychoticism (P), disguise tendency (L) dimensions to higher than the average score to determine the extent, P scale: T> 61.5 for the typical mental quality, T 56.7 ~ 61.5 for the trend of mental quality, T <56.7 for Normal, L Scale: T> 70 is invalid. Results 142 (35.23%) had extraversion and typical camber, 145 (35.98%) had unstable mood and typical instability. Emotional instability accounted for 58.82% (50/85) of introverts and 16 (3.97% ) People tend to spiritual quality and the typical spiritual quality; social disguise tendency was skewed distribution. Compared with the administrative staff and the workers (P <0.05), N values (neuroticism) and L values (disguise tendencies) were significantly lower than those of the administrative staff, workers, scientific and technical personnel and judicial police. (P <0.05); There was significant difference between P value (mental quality) and administrative staff, scientific and technical personnel and judicial police (P <0.05); E, N, P, Only N (neuroticism) values in education level had statistical significance (P <0.01). Conclusions The train driver Eysenck’s personality traits tend to be emotionally unstable, simple and naive and tender; people who are more outward-oriented are more suitable for working as train drivers; and Eysenck’s personality traits are slightly affected by age and education level.