论文部分内容阅读
索尔仁尼琴的《伊凡·杰尼索维奇的一天》和阿城的《棋王》中,主人公“吃”的情节虽不作为第一重点描写,但细节刻画都入木三分。在物质条件极度匮乏的情况下,主人公对“吃”都有一种虔诚的心态。但是不同的是,相对于集中营,中国知青整体的生活条件稍微好一些;索尔仁尼琴和阿城对主人公“吃”的叙述方式也有所不同;两篇作品中的“吃”与人物塑造、主题表达的关系不太相同。
Solzhenitsyn’s “Ivan Denisovich’s Day” and Ah Cheng’s “Chess King”, the hero “eat ” plot though not as the first key description, but the details are described as one-third. In the case of extreme lack of material conditions, the protagonist has a devout attitude towards “eating”. However, the difference is that the living conditions of Chinese educated youth as a whole are slightly better than that of concentration camps. The way in which Solzhenitsyn and Ah Cheng described the protagonists as “eating” is also different. In the two works, "And characterization, theme expression is not the same relationship.