论文部分内容阅读
逮捕是刑事诉讼中最为严厉的强制措施,其以剥夺犯罪嫌疑人自由的方式来保证诉讼程序的顺利进行。根据我国《刑事诉讼法》的规定,逮捕可以概括成无自由裁量权的逮捕和有自由裁量权的逮捕两种。其中有自由裁量权的逮捕必然涉及到犯罪嫌疑人社会危险性的判断。关于社会危险性判断的参考要素,《刑事诉讼法》79条给出了五种情况,但是其在法理权衡以及实际运用方面仍存在得商榷之问题。本文从逮捕制度设定的目的角度出发,探讨了不同判断条件在法理上以及在实际运用的侧重点上可能存在或已表现出的问题。
Arrests are the most severe compulsory measure in criminal proceedings, which guarantees the smooth progress of the proceedings by depriving the suspects of their freedom. According to China’s “Code of Criminal Procedure,” arrests can be summed up in two ways: arrest without discretion and arrest with discretion. Among them, the arrest with discretion inevitably involves the judgment of the social risk of criminal suspects. As for the reference elements of social risk judgment, Article 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure gives five kinds of situations, but there are still some open questions on the trade-offs between law and practice. Based on the purpose of the arrest system, this article explores the problems that may exist or have appeared in the jurisprudence and the practical application of different judgments.