论文部分内容阅读
《史记》和《汉书》采录大量神怪材料入史,其中对材料的拣别和编次透射出史家对人事与天命的看法,也是史家历史观和神话观的呈现。本文针对《史记》《汉书》对刘邦神话材料、灾异材料和传说时代神话材料的处理比较司马迁和班固对天命和人事关系的不同认识,从而探讨二者反映在历史观上的差异。
Historical records and Han dynasties recorded a large number of magical materials into history, and the selection and editing of materials revealed the views of the historians on personnel and destiny, which were also the historical and mythological views of historians. This paper aims to compare Si Maqian’s and Ban Gu’s different understanding of the relationship between heavenly and human life in terms of the handling of Liu Bang’s mythological material, catastrophic materials and legendary mythological material in Records of the Historian and the Han Dynasty, so as to explore the differences between the two reflected in the historical view.