论文部分内容阅读
国际上明确提出的有关环评目标和任务的条约、宣言构成了跨界河流环境影响评价制度的法律框架。以“乌拉圭河纸浆厂案”为典型的跨界水道案例揭示了环评中遵守程序责任的重要性。通过比照国内环评制度和国外环评制度在起草和审查当中的区别,提出对我国的环境影响评价制度的法律体系及管理体制的几点看法,例如:审查方法和程序还存有不足之处,即程序责任制度有待完善。指出我国跨界环评应当进一步加强对跨界河流的系统管理和科学决策,在程序责任当中应更加注重科学预防和公众参与等原则。
Internationally clear treaties and declarations on the goals and tasks of environmental assessment constitute the legal framework for the environmental impact assessment of transboundary rivers. The case of a transboundary watercourse typical of the “Uruguayan Pulp Mill Case” reveals the importance of compliance with procedural obligations in the EIA. By comparing the differences between the domestic environmental assessment system and the foreign environmental assessment system in the drafting and reviewing process, this paper puts forward several opinions on the legal system and management system of the environmental impact assessment system in our country. For example, there are still some shortcomings in the examination methods and procedures, Procedural responsibility system to be improved. It is pointed out that our country’s transboundary environmental impact assessment should further strengthen the system management and scientific decision-making of transboundary rivers, and pay more attention to the principles of scientific prevention and public participation among the procedural responsibilities.