论文部分内容阅读
尽管国际投资仲裁中所援引的先例并没有强制约束力,但是晚近以来,先例在国际投资仲裁实践中还是得到了普遍的使用,其原因主要有:国际投资法制和裁决的特殊性、先例所具有的说服性功能、先例的一致性功能等。应该注意的是,先例使用存在很多缺陷,因此,国际投资仲裁中的先例使用不是普通法(法律)意义上的遵循先例,而仅是事实上的遵循先例。这就要求仲裁机构使用先例时应对其进行详细分析、评估和管理;对中国来说,则要加强对先例的系统性研究。
Although the precedent cited in international investment arbitration is not binding, the precedent has been generally used in international investment arbitration practice recently for the following reasons: the particularity of the international investment law and ruling and the precedent of The persuasive function, precedent’s consistency function and so on. It should be noted that there are many shortcomings in the use of precedents, and therefore, the use of precedents in international investment arbitration is not a precedent in the common law (law) sense, but merely a de facto follow precedent. This requires arbitration institutions to use the precedent in a detailed analysis, assessment and management; for China, we must strengthen the precedent of the systematic study.