论文部分内容阅读
在有关我国古代档案管理及保护的论著中,对古代档案管理与保护的实际状况的描述与评价中存在不少误解。最突出的表现是以今律古及不恰当的推理逻辑,如将近现代档案管理中的默认前提——“原件”概念、珍贵书画作品及稀见善本图书的传统保护手段即修复、托裱技术也不适当地演绎认定为古代档案管理与保护实践中的题中应有之义。而事实上,古代文献(文物)保护技术的移植是有选择性的,档案保护技术的移植也是如此。
In the treatises on the management and protection of ancient archives in our country, there are many misunderstandings about the description and evaluation of the actual conditions of ancient archives management and protection. The most prominent manifestation is that the ancient and improper logic of reasoning, such as the default preconditions in modern archives management - the traditional means of protection of the concepts of “originals”, precious paintings and calligraphic works, rare books, that is, repair and mounting techniques Also improper interpretation of the ancient records as the management and protection of the proper meaning of the problem. In fact, the transplantation of ancient documents (artifacts) protection technology is selective, as is the transplantation of file protection technologies.