论文部分内容阅读
目的分析某高校大学新生中存在一定心理健康问题的学生的构成和心理特点,同时比较两种心理调查方法的优劣。方法采用UPI调查问卷筛查总分≥25分的学生,用SCL-90症状自评量表评价9个因子的得分情况,并将男女生、城镇学生与农村学生的因子得分进行对比分析。结果 UPI一类学生的SCL-90的各因子得分显著高于全国常模,但在躯体化这一因子上与常模无统计学意义;UPI一类的男女生之间、城镇学生和农村学生SCL-90的各因子得分无统计学意义。结论 UPI的筛查结果和SCL-90的筛查结果差异较大;UPI的筛查简单明了,易于统计,SCL-90的筛查较为繁琐,但症状明晰,相对准确。
Objective To analyze the constitution and psychological characteristics of students who have some mental health problems in college freshmen, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods of psychological investigation. Methods The UPI questionnaire was used to screen the students with a total score of ≥25 points. The SCL-90 Symptom Checklist was used to evaluate the scores of nine factors. The scores of factor scores of boys and girls, urban students and rural students were compared. Results The score of each factor of SCL-90 in UPI students was significantly higher than that of the national norm, but there was no significant difference between the factor of somatization and the norm. The male and female students of UPI, urban students and rural students SCL-90 score of each factor was not statistically significant. Conclusion The screening results of UPI and SCL-90 are quite different. The screening of UPI is simple and easy, and the screening of SCL-90 is cumbersome, but the symptoms are clear and relatively accurate.