论文部分内容阅读
将自然科学的方法范式引入社会科学的自然主义进路,由于坚持了自然科学的公共性、可重复性和价值中立原则,保证了社会科学可以以一门科学的形式发展,因而成了当今社会科学哲学的主流,这一进路的合法性也得到了越来越多的实践证明和学者的认可。但与此同时,以诠释学和实用主义为代表的非自然主义进路则认为社会科学和自然科学之间存在着本体论层面的张力,社会科学的复杂性和独特性使其难以采取自然科学的方法范式,据此自然主义进路发出挑战。塞尔在吸收这些批判的基础上,坚持自然主义原则,从集体意向性出发,建构了一种旨在中和社会科学的独特性和自然主义方法论之间的矛盾的社会实在论。塞尔的这一思路可以作为自然主义社会科学哲学的一种出路。
Introducing the paradigm of natural science into the naturalist approach of social science has ensured that social science can develop in a scientific form by upholding the principle of publicity, repeatability and value neutrality of natural science, The mainstream of philosophy of science, the legitimacy of this approach has also been more and more proven and scholars recognized. But at the same time, the non-naturalism represented by hermeneutics and pragmatism considers that there is an ontological tension between the social sciences and the natural sciences. The complexity and uniqueness of the social sciences makes it difficult to adopt natural science The paradigm of the method whereby the naturalist approach poses a challenge. On the basis of absorbing these critiques, Searl insisted on the principle of naturalism and proceeded from the collective intentionality to construct a social realism aimed at neutralizing the contradiction between the uniqueness of the social sciences and the naturalist methodology. This idea of Searle can serve as a way out of the philosophy of naturalist social sciences.