论文部分内容阅读
司法过程中逻辑与直觉的作用如何,曾引发极大争论,这一争论在哈特的法哲学中占据中心地位。Douglas Lind系统考察了哈特对逻辑一直觉争论的独特贡献,认为法律形式主义与法律现实主义及自由法运动都以自己的方式误读司法实践,他将司法决定过程看成是本质上的理性事业,但在较小而仍重大的意义上,也承认直觉在司法实践中的作用。
The role of logic and intuition in the judicial process has caused great controversy, a controversy that occupies a central place in Hart’s legal philosophy. Douglas Lind systematically examines Hart’s unique contribution to the logic of always arguing that legal formalism, legal realism, and liberal law movements misread judicial practice in their own ways, treating the judicial decision process as essentially rational The cause, but in a smaller but still significant sense, also recognizes the role of intuition in judicial practice.