“闯黄灯”案的争议实质是对“黄灯亮时,已越过停止线的车辆可以继续通行”规定的不同理解。法院从文义解释出发,辅以体系解释、目的解释,认定“闯黄灯”违法。但反对的观点按照同样的解释方法得出了不同的结论。在文义解释不足以得出明确结论时,有必要把握法条的整体,从法律规定的目的角度加强说理。但论理解释须尊重客观规律,并借鉴和遵循专业领域的知识。 “The case of yellow light ” controversial substance is different understanding of the provisions of the “yellow lights, vehicles that have crossed the stop line can continue to pass ”. Court started from the text interpretation, supplemented by system interpretation, the purpose of interpretation, that “break the yellow light ” illegal. But the objections came to different conclusions in the same way. When the explanation of the text is not enough to reach a definite conclusion, it is necessary to grasp the whole law and strengthen the reasoning from the perspective of the law. However, the reasoning should respect the objective laws and learn from and follow the professional knowledge.