论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨leep刀和微波在治疗妇科病慢性宫颈炎中的主要疗效。方法:随机选择2011年4月-2012年12月来我门诊就诊的30例慢性宫颈炎患者,将30例患者分成治疗组和对照组,每组15例,对所有患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,然后对治疗组进行Leep刀治疗,对照组进行微波治疗,最后对两组的疗效结果进行对比分析。结果:Leep刀治疗出血量比微波治疗出血量多,两种方法对轻度或中度患者差异不明显,在重度患者治疗中差异才比较显著,Leep刀治疗具有较大疗效,与微波治疗疗效对比有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:妇科慢性巩宫颈炎患者使用Leep刀治疗效果比较显著,具有创伤小、手术时间短且治愈率高的特点,但是在轻中度患者治疗中,Leep刀治疗和微波治疗差异不明显。
Objective: To investigate the main efficacy of leep knife and microwave in the treatment of gynecological chronic cervicitis. Methods: Thirty patients with chronic cervicitis who came to our clinic from April 2011 to December 2012 were randomly selected. Thirty patients were divided into treatment group and control group, with 15 cases in each group. The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed Analysis, and then the treatment group Leep knife treatment, the control group for microwave treatment, and finally the efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results: The bleeding volume of Leep knife was more than that of microwave treatment. There was no significant difference between the two methods in patients with mild or moderate disease, and the difference was significant in the treatment of severe patients. Leep knife treatment had a greater curative effect than microwave treatment The comparison was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of chronic cervicitis in patients with gynecological chronic Leep knife treatment is more obvious, with less trauma, shorter operative time and high cure rate, but in patients with mild to moderate treatment, Leep knife treatment and microwave treatment was not significantly different.