论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解处于不同地区的企业青年管理人员的心理健康情况。[方法]使用SCL-90和SF-36量表对受调查人员进行测试,并与常模比较。[结果]北京企业青年管理人员在人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对和偏执等因子得分较标准得分分别有显著差异(P﹤0.05)和极显著差异(P﹤0.01)。山东企业青年管理人员在强迫症状、人际关系、抑郁等因子得分较标准得分分别有显著差异(p﹤0.05)和极显著差异(P﹤0.01)。北京企业青年管理人员在MH项目得分较标准得分有极显著差异(P﹤0.01)。山东企业青年管理人员在GH项目得分和标准得分有显著差异(P﹤0.05),在VT、SF和MH项目得分和标准得分差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。山东企业青年管理人员在GH项目得分和北京得分差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),在VT、SF和MH项目得分和北京得分差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。[结论]两企业的青年管理人员心理健康情况较好,北京某企业的青年管理人员的生存质量明显好于山东某企业的青年管理人员。
[Objective] To understand the mental health status of young managers in enterprises in different regions. [Methods] The SCL-90 and SF-36 scales were used to test the surveyed persons and compared with the norm. [Result] The results showed that there was significant difference (P <0.05) between the score of scores of interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety, hostility and paranoid in Beijing enterprises’ young managers and the standard scores (P <0.01). There was a significant difference (p <0.05) between the scores of obsessive compulsive symptoms, interpersonal relationship and depression in Shandong enterprise young managers and the standard scores (P <0.01). Beijing enterprise youth managers in the MH project score than the standard score was significantly different (P <0.01). There was a significant difference (P <0.05) between the score of Shandong project management staff and the standard score of GH project, and there was significant difference between standard score and score of VT, SF and MH (P <0.01). There was a significant difference between Shandong enterprise youth management staff score in GH project and Beijing score (P <0.05). There was significant difference between Beijing project score and Beijing score (P <0.01). [Conclusion] The mental health of the young managers in the two enterprises is better. The quality of life of the young managers in a certain enterprise in Beijing is obviously better than that of the young managers in a certain enterprise in Shandong.