许多命题老师常会遇到这样的问题:自认为本次命题花了很多时间,投下许多精力,进行反复打磨,感觉质量上乘,但当它付诸批改和课堂讲评时,却发现试题的确命制的不错,但参考答案存在诸如不正确、不完整、重复累赘等问题,难以达到初衷。其问题源自何处,应如何破解?笔者结合某市历史与社会中考试题对之进行剖析。一、关于试题与参考答案存在差距原因1.命题者在命题前,脑子中就预设了试题的答案。但设问往往超出了预设答案的范围。如:材料一新皇帝开始将早先在本国取得辉煌成功 Many proposition teachers often encounter such a problem: I think this proposition spent a lot of time, cast a lot of energy, repeated grinding, feel good quality, but when it was put in the comments and class comment, Not bad, but the reference answers such as incorrect, incomplete, repeat cumbersome and other issues, it is difficult to achieve the original intention. Where does the problem come from? How to solve the problem? The author analyzes the city history and social test questions. First, there is a gap between test questions and reference answers. 1. Propositions Before the proposition, the brain pre-set the answer to the test questions. But asking questions often go beyond the scope of the default answer. Such as: a new material Emperor began earlier glory in his own country success