《武当》杂志2002年11期刊载署名“寻真”先生的《真的是超出了吗?——与胡孚琛先生商榷》一文。内云:“不明白丹道的原理,对来源问题认识不清,就是拉来龙虎(注:指二人)作乾坤二鼎,仅仅是以人补人的所谓人体化学,又岂能补足丹家本人(注:另一人)的破漏之躯”。并引陈撄宁先生所云“凡父凡母是二人,灵父圣母亦是二人,决不至于拉第三人加入合作。若果如此办法,是谓侮辱大道”,来否定“三家相见”的“龙虎丹法”。又谓“胡孚琛先生所谓的三家四派之法,其实质并未超出陈撄宁先生所研究之范畴,且不识丹道之原理,一味巧立名目,叠床架屋,只能使学者坠入迷雾之中”。 “Wudang” magazine in 2002 eleventh issue of the signature “find truth” Mr. “is really beyond it? - Discussion with Mr. Hu Fuchen” article. Neiyun: “Do not understand the principle of Dan Road, the source of the problem is not clear, that is, dragons and dragons (Note: refers to the two) as heaven and earth two tripod, just human complement human so-called human chemistry, but also how to make up Dan himself (Note: the other person) of the broken body. ” And quoted Mr. Chen Suining as saying, “Where the father is the mother of two, the lady of the father is also two, will not pull the third person to join the cooperation. If so, is to insult the avenue,” to denounce the “three meet ”Dragon Hu Dan law.“ He also claimed that ”the law of the so-called“ four factions ”of Mr HU Fu-chen does not go beyond the scope of the study of Mr CHEN Bin-ning and does not recognize the principle of dynasticism. He blindly holds scholarship and blind-frame houses and can only sink scholars into the fog ".