在类分图书时,常常有人将《郭沫若全集》、《茅盾全集》等书归入1217.1,将《郭沫若选集》、《茅盾文集》、《臧克家文集》等书归入1217.2,即将“全集”入中国文学各时代作品集的总集,将“选集”、“文集”之类书入别集。究其原因,说:全集者乃是听有文章的汇集,故入“总集”;选集者则是其中部分文章而不是全部,故入“别集”。显然把“总集”,“别集”的概念搞错了。 When classifying books, people often classified “Guo Quan Ruo Complete Works” and “Mao Dun Quan Quan Ji” as 1217.1, and classified the books such as Guo Moruo Anthologies, Mao Dun Anthology and Zang Kejia Anthology into 1217.2, Chinese literature collection of the times, the collection of “election collection”, “anthology” and the like into the set. The reason, said: The Complete Works but listened to the collection of articles, so into the “total set”; selectors are some of the articles but not all, so into “do not set.” Obviously the “total set”, “do not set” concept mistaken.