论文部分内容阅读
风险社会理论对刑事立法的意义在于指导、解释,而非证明、建构。风险社会理论中,“有组织的不负责任”、“风险的高度不确定性”、“风险危惧感”三大特征向传统刑法提出了责任主体缺位、“罪刑均衡”困难、刑法在适应社会需求和坚守传统价值中进退两难三个问题。法人作为现代社会最活跃的单元,对这三项刑法危机都负有责任。摒弃脱胎于自然人的法人责任理论,确立法人独立责任,已成为时代的要求。在风险社会背景下,法人高度系统化、组织化特征则使其具备了与自然人分离的独立意志,强调法人责任不会造成自然人规避责任,相反会成为遏制法人犯罪的有效手段。此外,可以针对法人的特性设立多元经济罚。
The significance of risk society theory to criminal legislation lies in guiding, explaining, not proving and constructing. In the risk society theory, the three main characteristics of “organized irresponsibility ”, “high degree of uncertainty of risk ” and “risk Balanced ”difficulty, the criminal law in adapting to social needs and adhering to the traditional values of dilemma in the three issues. As the most active unit of modern society, legal persons are responsible for the three criminal crises. To abandon the theory of legal person born out of natural persons and establish the independent responsibility of legal persons has become a requirement of the times. In the context of risk society, the highly systematic and organized characteristics of legal persons make them possess the independent will to separate from natural persons. Emphasizing corporate responsibility will not cause natural persons to evade responsibility, on the contrary, they will become effective measures to curb corporate crimes. In addition, multiple economic penalties can be set for the characteristics of legal persons.