论文部分内容阅读
在直接故意犯罪的语境下,以刑法第347条所规定行为到底有没有行为目的,目的是什么为切入点展开论证。刑法第347条规定的走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品的行为具体是指制造毒品的行为,以贩卖为目的走私、运输,贩卖毒品的行为,以贩卖毒品为目的的持有毒品的行为;区别刑法第348条与第349条的关键在于行为目的确认。对运输毒品行为的定罪方面应具体问题具体分析,不宜一刀切。在运输毒品犯罪中如不能确实认定共同犯罪人的地位时,可以采用部分行为共同责任的原理进行处理。当一行为同时可以被“法条竞合”的各该法条进行事实上的“想象竞合”评价时,有必要在解释时考虑行为目的,以便对行为进行恰当地区分。
In the context of direct intentional crime, the purpose of the act stipulated in Article 347 of the Criminal Law is to prove whether there is any purpose or not. The act of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing narcotic drugs as defined in Article 347 of the Criminal Law specifically refers to the act of manufacturing narcotics, smuggling, transporting and selling narcotics for the purpose of trafficking and the possession of narcotics for the purpose of drug trafficking; The key to articles 348 and 349 of the Penal Code is the act of affirmation. Convictions on drug trafficking should be analyzed in a concrete way on specific issues and should not be applied across the board. In the case of the crime of transporting narcotics, if the status of the co-criminals can not be truly ascertained, the principle of partial act of shared responsibility can be adopted. When a conduct can be factually “imagined competing” for each of the articles of the “confederation”, it is necessary to consider the purpose of the act in the interpretation in order to properly differentiate the conduct.