论文部分内容阅读
原告诉称被告侵害其合法权益没有法律依据,法院应裁定驳回起诉,“相邻防盗权”没有法律上、理论上的依据。本代理人认为:一、(民法通则)第83条规定:“不动产的相邻各方,应当按照有利于生产、方便生活、团结互助、公平合理的精神,正确处理截水、排水、通行、通风、采光
The plaintiff claimed that there was no legal basis for the defendant to infringe upon his lawful rights and interests. The court should rule that the prosecution should be rejected. There is no legal or theoretical basis for “neighboring anti-theft rights.” This agent believes that: 1. Article 83 of the General Principles of Civil Law states: "Neighbors of immovable property shall correctly handle the water-holding, drainage, traffic, waterway, drainage, drainage, drainage and drainage in accordance with the principles of being conducive to production, convenience for life, solidarity, mutual assistance and fairness and reasonableness, Ventilation, lighting