论文部分内容阅读
交通肇事案件是刑事案件中最常见的一种,作为一种过失犯罪,“肇事后逃逸”的认定对于案件的定性和量刑都具有重大影响。在司法实践中,公安交警部门出具的行政法意义上的事故责任认定书是刑事责任认定的核心和基础,但基于行政法上的责任认定,是否能够直接作为刑法责任认定的依据无论在法理上还是在司法实务中都还有诸多方面值得商榷。本文就司法实践中存在的部分典型案件为例,从“肇事后逃逸”的核心价值追求和行政法上的责任认定与刑事责任承担之间的衔接的角度,阐述了对于“肇事后逃逸”的认识和在司法实践中的意义。
The traffic accident cases are the most common kind in criminal cases. As a crime of negligence, the identification of “escape after a crime” has a significant impact on the qualitative and sentencing of cases. In judicial practice, the certificate of accident responsibility issued by the public security and traffic police department in the sense of administrative law is the core and basis of the criminal liability determination. However, whether it can be directly used as the basis for the criminal liability cognizance on the basis of the recognition of responsibility in administrative law There are still many aspects that are debatable in judicial practice. This paper, on the part of typical cases existing in judicial practice, expounds the connection between the core value pursuit of “escaping after the accident” and the assumption of responsibility in the administrative law and the commitment of criminal responsibility Escape "and its significance in judicial practice.