论文部分内容阅读
《太平广记详节》为朝鲜时期集贤殿文人成任编纂的《太平广记》选本,所据《太平广记》底本为宋本,今存韩国。谈本《太平广记》三种印本的说法源于汪绍楹先生中华书局版《太平广记》的《点校说明》。本文据《太平广记详节》考辨谈本《太平广记》的三种印本。在参照前人结论和新文献的基础上进一步证实:“后印本”为第一次印本;“初印本”为第二次印本;“最后印本”为第三次印本。并进而提出,第一次印本卷二六五、卷二六九和卷二七○篇目为谈恺自补;第二次印本补足了卷二六五、卷二六九和卷二七○阙佚的宋本篇目;第三次印本补足了阙佚的卷二六一至二六四的宋本卷次,却保留了第一次印本谈恺自补卷次篇目。第一次印本主要据史书补阙人物事迹,第二次印本不仅更好地体现了卷二六五“轻薄”这一类目主题,还忠实地反映了《太平广记》编者从笔记小说、地方志和类书中采撷篇目,注重故事情节奇趣性的倾向,这使我们进一步认识到《太平广记》编者对笔记小说与正史文集有着初步的区分。
The “Taipingguangji Details” is a copy of “Taipingguangji” compiled by the literary men of the Jixian Temple during the Joseon Dynasty. According to “Taipingguangji”, the original copy was Songben, which is currently kept in Korea. Talk about the “Taipingguangji” three printed version of the statement from Mr. Wang ShaoxingZhonghua Bookstore version of “Taipingguangji” “point school description.” This article according to “Tai Ping Guangji details” textual research on the “Taiping Guangji” three kinds of printed copies. Based on the conclusion of predecessors and the new literature, it is further confirmed that “Postpress” is the first print; “First print” is the second print; “The Last Print” is the third print. And then proposed that the first printed volume two six five, volume two six nine and volume two hundred and seventy-seven for the purpose of talking about Kai self-supplement; the second printed make up volume two six five, volume two six nine and volume two seven hundred Que Lost Song of the article; the third print to make up the Que Lv Volume Volume 261-264 of the Song volume, but retained the first print Tan Kai since the volume of articles. The first printed book mainly according to the history books complement Que people deeds, the second print not only better reflects the volume of 265 “light ” this kind of topic, but also faithfully reflects the “Tai Ping Guang Ji” editor from notes Fiction, local history and class books to pick chapters, focus on the story of the interesting nature of the tendency, which makes us further aware of “Tai Ping Guang Ji” editor of the novel and the history of the essay has a preliminary distinction.