抗战时期钱穆的文化复兴思想主要体现在三个方面,一是对历史虚无主义的批判,反对清末以来一些“革新派”的史学家和思想家以西方文化为评价标准,不加分析地把中西历史文化传统与性格的不同,看成是先进(西方)与落后(中国)的区别,把自秦以来二千年的中国历史都说成是“中古时代”或“封建时代”的历史,否认中国历史文化的发展和进步,甚至自我菲薄,把中国历史文化说得一无是处,而主张对中国历史文化要有“温情与敬意”;二是对中国文化特殊性的阐释,在考察中国文化赖以产生的独特环境的基础上,就中国文化与欧洲文化在政治、经济、人生观念和宗教等方面的不同进行了比较,并提出了自己独特的中国文化演进过程的四期说;三是对文化复兴之道路的探索,主张以“儒家思想为中心”来接纳或吸取西方的科学。 During the war of resistance against Japan, Qianmu’s cultural rejuvenation thought mainly embodied in three aspects: one was the criticism of nihilism of history; the opposition of some “innovators” historians and thinkers since the late Qing Dynasty took western culture as the evaluation standard, The difference between the traditional culture and the character is regarded as the difference between the advanced (the west) and the backward (china). To regard the two centuries of Chinese history since the Qin as the history of the “middle ages” or “feudal times” The development and progress of history and culture, and even the self-indulgence, have made the Chinese history and culture absolutely useless and claimed to have “warmth and respect” for Chinese history and culture. The second is the interpretation of the particularity of Chinese culture and the examination of the Chinese culture Based on the unique environment of Chinese culture and European culture in the political, economic, life concepts and religious differences were compared, and put forward their own unique evolution of Chinese culture, said four; third is the cultural renaissance The path of exploration, advocating “Confucianism as the center” to accept or absorb Western science.