示范诉讼具有其他群体性纠纷解决制度所不具备的特征和独特功能,目前已经有许多国家和地区在民事诉讼立法中对其加以明确规定,还有些国家在实践中大量运用这一制度以解决实际问题。我国现行民事诉讼法有关群体性纠纷解决制度的规定运作不良,新形势下人民法院又面临着解决群体性纠纷的更高现实要求,但我国法学界对示范诉讼制度鲜有研究,对审判实践中是否可适用示范诉讼制度也存在争议。笔者在分析示范诉讼制度基本理论的基础上,结合我国代表人诉讼制度面临的实际问题,对当前我国审判实践中可否适用以及如何适用该项制度进行了探讨,以期为今后群体性纠纷的解决提供一些思路。 At present, there are many countries and regions that have clearly stipulated them in the legislation of civil procedure, and some countries make extensive use of this system in practice to solve the problems problem. Under the new situation, people’s courts are facing higher realistic demands for resolving group disputes. However, there are few studies on the model litigation system in China’s jurisprudence, Whether or not to apply the model litigation system is also controversial. Based on the analysis of the basic theory of the model litigation system and the practical problems that the representative litigation system in our country is facing, the author discusses the applicability and feasibility of the system in our country’s trial practice in order to provide a solution to the group dispute in the future Some ideas.