论文部分内容阅读
法律解释的任务和法律解释的标准是法学理论中的争议点。从法学方法论的角度出发,法律解释的目标有主观论和客观论之分,法律解释的方法或标准大致包括文义解释、体系解释、历史解释、合宪性解释等。不同的解释标准之间不是无所关联的并立关系,也不具有固定不变的位阶关系。总的来说,法律解释是一个以法律意旨为主导的思维过程;每一种解释方法须互相补足始能获致合理结果,贯彻正义理念。
The task of legal interpretation and the standard of legal interpretation are points of dispute in jurisprudence. From the perspective of jurisprudence, the objective of legal interpretation is subjective and objective. The methods or standards of legal interpretation generally include the explanation of texts, the explanation of systems, the explanation of history, the explanation of constitutionality. Different standards of interpretation are not unrelated nor are they related to each other, nor do they have a fixed hierarchical relationship. In general, legal interpretation is a process of thinking dominated by legal intention; each method of interpretation must complement each other to achieve reasonable results and implement the concept of justice.