论文部分内容阅读
利益衡量理论是当前法律方法研究的重要内容。这种解释方法突破传统的司法三段论,充分考虑各种法律上的价值,将目光投放于法律渊源之外的社会。不同于传统法律方法,利益衡量更多的考虑对以后的影响。这种对合理性解释的追寻亦是出于实质正义的考量,是一种理想化的模式。这为我们解释和适用法律提供了一种新的可能。然而这种方法的固有缺陷使之不可避免的具有主观性的危险。本文试图梳理利益衡量理论的发展脉络,对利益衡量方法的不足进行概括分析,从而构建利益衡量理想模式的蓝图,进而探寻利益衡量的规范进路。
The theory of interest measurement is an important part of the current research on legal methods. This method of interpretation breaks through the traditional syllogism of the judiciary, takes full account of various legal values and focuses on the society outside the source of law. Unlike traditional legal approaches, the benefits measure more impact on later. This kind of pursuit of rational explanation is also based on considerations of substantive justice and is an idealized model. This provides a new possibility for us to interpret and apply the law. However, the inherent shortcomings of this approach make it inevitable subjectivity. This paper tries to sort out the development vein of the theory of interest measurement, summarize the deficiency of the method of interest measurement, and then construct the blueprint of the ideal model of interest measurement, and then explore the standard path of the interest measurement.