基于震源机制解的矿井采动应力场反演与应用

来源 :岩石力学与工程学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:trjycp
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
为反演采动应力场,以老虎台矿井为研究背景,应用地震学的岩体破裂震源机制解答方法,求解出矿井范围81个强矿震的震源机制,结合现场调查和地应力测量,分析矿井尺度岩体采动应力场的规律。研究发现:由于不同性质断层的切割和不同的采动方式,导致采动过程矿井范围岩体主应力性质并非一致,表现出分区特征;一个共性特征是,相对于原岩应力场,采动应力场最小主应力轴由近水平转变为近垂直;进入深部开采,正断层不只是流体的存储空间和运移通道,其在采动应力作用下可活化异变为逆冲断层运动,并可灾变为强矿震能量释放;震源机制解对矿柱失稳、顶板大规模垮落、正断层逆冲灾变、逆断层活化等具有明确指示意义。矿井布设工程度微震监测系统,跟踪、反演分析采动过程岩体破裂机制,可以超前发现采动断层活化与异变成灾趋向,及时采取防范措施。 In order to reverse the mining stress field, taking the Laohutai mine as a research background, the focal mechanism of 81 strong earthquakes in the mine area was solved by applying the seismological solution method of rock mass focal mechanism. Combined with field investigation and in-situ stress measurement, Laws of mining stress field in rock scale rock mass. The results show that due to the cutting of different faults and different mining methods, the main stress of the rock mass in mining process is not consistent and the characteristics of subarea are shown. One common characteristic is that the mining stress The minimum principal stress axis of the field transforms from near horizontal to near vertical. When it enters deep mining, the normal fault is not only the fluid storage space and migration channel, but it can be activated and transformed to thrust fault movement under mining stress and can be catastrophic It is clear that the solution of source mechanism has clear indication to the instability of pillar, large-scale roof caving, thrust fault catastrophe of normal fault and reverse fault activation. Mine cloth degree of engineering microseismic monitoring system, tracking, back analysis of mining process rock mass rupture mechanism, can be found ahead of the mining fault activation and mutation disaster trends, timely preventive measures.
其他文献
研究了MAC镁质混凝土抗裂剂的延迟微膨胀性能、作用机理及温度补偿效果,并结合工程实例数据对比分析该种产品相比硫铝酸钙CSA膨胀剂的优点。在广东某项目地下室大体积筏板基
射频消融阻断下腔静脉至三尖瓣环间的右心房峡部是治疗典型心房扑动(房扑)的有效方法。目前,多采用消融后分别起搏峡部两侧,观察心房激动顺序的变化或消融线径上的宽间期双电位来检测峡部完全阻滞的存在。本文提出另一种可靠而快捷的方法,对判断峡部完全性阻滞有较大价值。
数个随机的临床试验均已证实,与普通裸金属支架(BMS)相比植入雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)可在3年内明显减少再狭窄率和靶病变血运重建的几率.RAVEL试验和SIRIUS试验发现,SES的再狭窄率分别为0和8.9%.而在包含了诸多"复杂病变"如小血管、长病变、合并糖尿病的SIRIUS研究中,与BMS组相比较,SES对支架内再狭窄的影响仍然显示了明显的优势(42.3% vs 5.9%).在上述试验中,支