本文以“日本债权法修正的基本方针”的制定为契机,对表见代理制度中争议比较大的本人归责要件问题进行了理论探索。通过对“日本债权法修正的基本方针”、现行《日本民法典》中的有关规定以及相关的学说、判例的考察,本文认为,表见代理情形下的本人是否要承担履行责任的问题与意思表示瑕疵情形下表意人是否要承担履行责任的问题具有高度的价值相似性,所以对前一问题应类推适用民法对后一问题所制定的价值判断标准。所以,民法表见代理制度中的本人归责要件可以通过民法上的有关意思表示瑕疵的规定来予以确定。 This article takes the opportunity of the formulation of “Basic Guidelines for the Revision of Japanese Debt Law” to conduct a theoretical exploration on the issue of the principal part of the blame in the proxy system of representation. By examining the relevant provisions of the “Japan Civil Code” and related doctrines and precedents, this paper argues that whether or not I have to shoulder the responsibility of fulfilling the representation in the case of proxy And the meaning of the flaw in the case of ideological whether to assume responsibility to carry out the issue of a high degree of similarity in value, so the previous question should be applied analogy civil law on the latter issue of the value of the criteria established. Therefore, the civil law table see the principal component of the system of responsibility can be blamed on the civil law by the relevant provisions of the flaws to be identified.